Green
Showing posts with label Funds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Funds. Show all posts

Saturday, August 17, 2013

North Dakota Proposes Redirecting Education Funds For Milk Program

A Republican state senator in North Dakota wants to direct funds to provide milk for low-income students, but Democrats say that he may end up hurting the students he is seeking to help.

On Wednesday, state Sen, Tim Flakoll (R-Fargo) proposed an amendment to the new $1.8 billion education funding formula to pay for milk breaks for low-income students. The move comes almost two months after the state House Education Committee voted down Democratic legislation to fund such a program.

Democrats argue that Flakoll's proposal would take money from the $16.6 million allotted specifically for educational programs for at-risk students, and direct it toward buying milk and juice instead.

“The way the amendment is ... the money is used for a daily milk or juice break," state House Assistant Minority Leader Corey Mock (D-Grand Forks) told The Huffington Post. "It takes $16.6 million for at-risk kids and says it has to be used for supplemental nutrition. You are robbing Timmy to pay Johnny."

Mock said that the money dedicated to at-risk students should be used for tutors and paraprofessionals, too -- not just the milk program. The original version of the bill called for $500,000 over two years for milk for students. At the time, Republicans argued that the proposal was redundant, citing state-funded breakfast and lunch programs.

Flakoll said that his amendment will not take away funds from educational services.

"The only specific language is that if they have a milk break ... they use it to pay for milk for low-income families," Flakoll said. "The excess money is used for mentors and tutors, and those types of things.”

But Mock said that he and education advocates believe that because the only specific spending mentioned for at-risk funds in the bill is for milk, school districts would be restricted. He said he would prefer an additional $500,000 be set aside for the milk program and the language removed to prevent cuts to at-risk educational programs.

Flakoll disagreed with Mock's call that the milk money not come from the at-risk funds. He said that under Mock's plan, which is similar to the original version of the bill, if a school district did not want to offer milk, it would not be able to use the money for something else. He said under his plan, a district could redirect unused milk money to another program for at-risk students.

Flakoll also noted that low-income students receive breakfast with milk around 8 a.m. and lunch with milk around noon, so the mid-morning milk break would be a third milk serving for students.

"In essence, we are saying we’ll pay if you want to give them milk every 90 minutes," he said.

Mock, however, said that the state, which has posted record budget surpluses due to oil and gas revenue, could afford milk in addition to everything else.

"Earlier this session we passed personal and corporate tax reductions in a state that has one of the lowest tax rates in the country," he said. "We gave around $500 million in tax reductions. We’re giving away a lot in tax reductions to people who are not asking for it and not helping those people who are trying to overcome the challenges they face daily.”


View the original article here

Saturday, July 20, 2013

Dolphins' Super Bowl Deal: Won't Use Public Funds If Stadium Not Awarded Super Bowl (VIDEO, PHOTOS)

MIAMI GARDENS -- The Dolphins made a deal with Miami-Dade County voters Thursday: if South Florida doesn't get Super Bowl 2016 or 2017, the team won't use tax money for Sun Life Stadium renovations.

NFL owners vote on the locations of those Super Bowls on May 22 in Boston. There's still no date set for a public referendum for Miami-Dade County voters to approve that tax money.

The Dolphins also announced downtown Miami will be hosting the core of the Super Bowl activities. When the Super Bowl was held in South Florida in 2010, Broward and Dade counties shared hosting duties.

"If Miami does not get a Super Bowl at that May 22 meeting, even with a successful referendum, we're going to give the community the option to not move forward," Dolphins CEO Mike Dee said at a news conference at Sun Life Stadium.

Dee said Dolphins owner Steve Ross talked to NFL owners and league officials at the annual NFL Meetings in Phoenix earlier this week and feels confident the Dolphins will get one of those Super Bowls.

Dee said although he couldn't guarantee which Super Bowl South Florida would get, "...we are guaranteeing the referendum will be predicated upon a successful Super Bowl outcome on May 22."

"This is the likes of something you haven't seen," said Rodney Barreto, chairman of the South Florida Super Bowl Host Committee.

South Florida is battling Santa Clara/San Francisco 49ers for Super Bowl L in 2016, and if unsuccessful in that bid, then South Florida goes against Houston for Super Bowl LI.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell said Tuesday at the annual NFL Meetings it'd be tough for South Florida to get another Super Bowl without the proposed $400 million upgrades.

"It is important for us to play the game on the best possible stage and the stadiums are getting better and better," Goodell said.

Ross has pledged to pay more than half of the $400 million Sun Life renovation cost plus any overruns.

Much of the remaining financing would be done by raising the mainland hotel bed tax to 7 percent from the current 6 percent, and $90 million in sales-tax rebates over 30 years.

Dee wasn't sure the Dolphins would have made the money back guarantee if they didn't experience such a positive outcome after speaking with NFL officials and owners in Phoenix.

"I don't know; perhaps not," he said.

Ross and Dee have said Sun Life Stadium also need upgrades to remain in the mix to attract college football's national championship game. The major enemy, however, is new NFL stadiums luring Super Bowls. Sun Life Stadium, everyone agrees, needs to upgrade to stay comeptitive.

Still, Dee has little doubt the Dolphins will get either Super Bowl L or LI.

"We have great confidence that South Florida will be awarded a Super Bowl on May 22 when the owners vote in Boston," Dee said. "And I can't tell you which one that'll be, but I can tell you we're confident that vote will go our way." ___

Loading Slideshow...Related on HuffPost:


View the original article here

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

How to get the funds to start my own photography business?

Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.


View the original article here

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

Money to invest - do you have a LEGTIMATE idea/business that needs funds?

Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.


View the original article here

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Eric Garcetti Challenges Wendy Greuel To Donate Half Of SuperPAC Funds To Charity

City Councilman Eric Garcetti challenged rival Controller Wendy Greuel to donate half of the outside funds spent on their respective L.A. mayoral campaigns to charity at a Sherman Oaks debate on Wednesday.

Garcetti says he wants to lessen special interests' influence in the 2013 mayor's race. Greuel is his closest rival in the race.

Independent expenditure committees and SuperPACs aren't governed by contribution limits, and can spend lavishly on candidates. The committees are forbidden from coordinating with the candidates campaigns, but they hold huge influence since they can buy advertising, mailers and radio spots.

Greuel looked taken aback by Garcetti's question. She called it "gimmicky" and said she'd "look at" his proposal.

The challenge came during a lively stretch of the debate, when the participating candidates, which included Greuel, Garcetti, Councilwoman Jan Perry and attorney Kevin James, asked one another questions.

All are vying to succeed Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who is termed out in June.

The debate, moderated by L.A. Weekly reporter Gene Maddaus, was hosted by the Sherman Oaks Homeowners Association. It was attended by a few hundred people, who applauded at certain points for each of the four candidates.

In raising the issue of campaign financing, Garcetti pointed to Massachusetts, where Sen. Scott Brown (R) and his Democratic rival, Elizabeth Warren opted to keep SuperPACs, funds raised by outsiders, out of their race.

"Will you agree to do the following..to pledge to spend half of whatever they do, and give it to a charity of the other person's choice," he asked Greuel. "Will you make that pledge, too?"

Greuel responded that most of her campaign donations come in small amounts.

"Tonight is the first I have heard about it...so I appreciate the somewhat gimmicky suggestion that you're suggesting tonight," Greuel said. "But I think what the public wants is to make sure is that we're talking about the issues that are important to our community and to our neighborhoods."

The question came two days after a political consultant said Greuel received the backing of the powerful Department of Water and Power union IBEW, which is promising to spend money on an extensive television campaign for Greuel.

Garcetti's proposal also came on the day that the Los Angeles Police Protective League, which represents rank and file officers, endorsed Greuel. The league reportedly spent more than $700,000 on Carmen Trutanich's run for city attorney in 2009.

But it was the DWP union's pledge to fund Greuel that became a theme throughout the night.

"I do believe that if people spend a lot of money on you in an election, they aren't doing it just because they love you. They want something from you," Garcetti said at one point. He said he supports elections that only rely on public financing.

An ABC7/Survey USA poll released Wednesday found that Garcetti is leading the race.

Garcetti garnered 26 percent of the vote, while Greuel took in 18 percent of the vote. James and Perry both tied for third with 12 percent each.

The poll, conducted by phone, and online, interviewed 1,000 people. The poll didn't list the margin of error, but James' campaign said the margin of error was 4.3 percent.

dakota.smith@dailynews.com

213-978-0390

twitter.com/dakotacdsmith ___

Also on HuffPost:


View the original article here