Green

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Steubenville Rape Trial Verdict: Trent Mays, Ma'lik Richmond Found Guilty

Steubenville Rape Trial Verdict Defendants Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond.

A judge announced on Sunday that the defendants in the Steubenville rape trial were found guilty.

Trent Mays and Ma'lik Richmond had been accused of sexually assaulting a female acquaintance while she was severely intoxicated. Video and photo footage from the night of the incident spread across the internet soon after, drawing national attention to the case.

Mays and Richmond, both football players at Steubenville High School, received delinquent verdicts on all three charges. Delinquent is the guilty equivalent for juveniles. They were both convicted of digitally penetrating the West Virginia girl, and Mays was also found guilty of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material. The boys will serve their sentence at a juvenile detention facility until they turn 21.

The defendants and their family members openly wept at the verdict.

The victim, who has not been identified, testified in court on Saturday that she did not remember the attack, but that she remembered waking up naked in a house she did not recognize. Other members of the small Ohio community also testified against the defendants.

Here's more on the case from the AP:

STEUBENVILLE, Ohio — Two members of the high school football team that is the pride of Steubenville were found guilty Sunday of raping a drunken 16-year-old girl in a case that bitterly divided the Rust Belt city and led to accusations of a cover-up to protect the community's athletes.

Steubenville High School students Trent Mays and Ma'Lik Richmond face a possible sentence of detention in juvenile jail until they turn 21, capping a case that came to light via a barrage of morning-after text messages, social media posts and online photos and video.

Both broke down in tears after the verdict was read.

Mays, 17, and Richmond, 16, were charged with digitally penetrating the West Virginia girl, first in the back seat of a moving car after an alcohol-fueled party on Aug. 11, and then in the basement of a house. Mays was also found guilty on a charge of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material.

The case roiled the community amid allegations that more students should have been charged and led to questions about the influence of the local football team, a source of a pride in a community of 18,000 that suffered massive job losses with the collapse of the steel industry. Their arms linked, protesters stood outside the courthouse Sunday morning awaiting the verdict, some wearing masks.

The trial opened last week as a contest between prosecutors determined to show the girl was so drunk she couldn't have been a willing participant that night, and defense attorneys soliciting testimony from witnesses that would indicate that the girl, though drunk, knew what she was doing.

The teenage girl testified Saturday that she could not recall what happened the night of the attack but remembered waking up naked in a strange house after drinking at a party. The girl said she recalled drinking, leaving the party holding hands with Mays and throwing up later. When she woke up, she said she discovered her phone, earrings, shoes, and underwear were missing, she testified.


"It was really scary," she said. "I honestly did not know what to think because I could not remember anything."

The girl said she believed she was assaulted when she later read text messages among friends and saw a photo of herself taken that night, along with a video that made fun of her and the alleged attack. She said she suspected she had been drugged because she couldn't explain being as intoxicated as defense witnesses have said she was.

"They treated her like a toy," said special prosecutor Marianne Hemmeter.

Evidence introduced at the trial included graphic text messages sent by numerous students after the night of the party, including by the accuser, containing provocative descriptions of sex acts and obscene language. Lawyers noted during the trial how texts have seemed to replace talking on the phone for contemporary teens. A computer forensic expert called by the state documented tens of thousands of texts found on 17 phones seized during the investigation.

The girl herself recalled being in a car later with Mays and Richmond and asking them what happened.

"They kept telling me I was a hassle and they took care of me," she testified. "I thought I could trust him (Mays) until I saw the pictures and video."

In questioning her account, defense attorneys went after her character and credibility. Two former friends of the girl testified that the accuser had a history of drinking heavily and was known to lie.

"The reality is, she drank, she has a reputation for telling lies," said lawyer Walter Madison, representing Richmond.

The two girls testified they were angry at the accuser because she was drinking heavily at the party and rolling around on the floor. They said they tried unsuccessfully to get her to stop drinking.

The accuser said that she does not remember being photographed as she was carried by Mays and Richmond, an image that stirred up outrage, first locally, then globally, as it spread online. Others have testified the photo was a joke and the girl was conscious when it was taken.

The photograph led to allegations that three other boys, two of them members of Steubenville High's celebrated Big Red team, saw something happening that night and didn't try to stop it but instead recorded it.

The three boys weren't charged, fueling months of online accusations of a cover-up to protect the team, which law enforcement authorities have vehemently denied.

Instead, the teens were granted immunity to testify, and their accounts helped incriminate the defendants. They said the girl was so drunk she didn't seem to know what was happening to her and confirmed she was digitally penetrated in a car and later on a basement floor.

Ohio's attorney general planned to announce later Sunday whether additional charges will be brought in the case, including against the three other boys.

Mays and Richmond were determined to be delinquent, the juvenile equivalent of guilty, Judge Thomas Lipps ruled in the juvenile court trial without a jury.

The Associated Press normally doesn't identify minors charged in juvenile court, but Mays and Richmond have been widely identified in news coverage, and their names have been used in open court. The AP also does not generally identify people who say they were victims of sex crimes.

Earlier on HuffPost:

Get Alerts

View the original article here

10 Articles on Online Poker

I have 10 articles for sale on the topic of Online Poker. They are well researched and are original. The word counts of the articles are all 300+ words. The buyer will have all rights to the articles after the sale is finalized and the articles will only be sold once. Articles will pass Copyscape. The price for this pack is $20.00.

Winning at Online Poker

Do People Make Money with Online Poker

Online Poker Tells

Online Poker Tools

Techniques to Win at online Poker

Online Poker Tips for Beginners

How Online Poker Review Sites Can Be Helpful

Effective Online Poker Tips

Benefits of Online Poker
This is an ad that I inserted!
Can People Win at Online Poker


View the original article here

Take My Money, Please

You are here: Home > Take My Money, Please

There’s an interesting post by Columbus, Ohio based patron Heather Brown that chronicles her recent experiences donating to arts organizations via their respective websites. The opening narrative describes a frustrating experience where an attempt to make a small, single donation was stymied by a host of hurdles in the online giving process.

ADAPTISTRATION-GUY-054 The shopping cart process will make or break conversion.

The impetus for her charitable venture was a moving concert experience, but everything from required registration, through process dead ends that require the user to call the organization’s respective office during business hours prevented a successful giving experience.

Normally, these hurdles would have caused her to walk away but she pressed on too see if her experience with this one site was unusual. What she discovered was most groups don’t make it very easy to donate online and if it were any other situation, she would have given up.

The process Heather described is called conversion, or how often a site visitor performs a desired action; such as buying tickets, engaging in a social share, or making a donation.

Within the orchestra field, something like online donation conversion is influenced by a few key points that more often than not, are misunderstood.

To really understand donation conversion, it is crucial to recognize that although users enter the donation process via your website, the actual journey and completion take place elsewhere.

The latter stage of the process is handled by a payment gateway, which is often integrated into an organization’s online box office process. For example, box office providers such as Ticketmaster and Tessitura design the processes which influence a donor’s online giving experience and in many instances, the actual web designers are completely removed from the process.

This isn’t a bad thing, and in some cases it can be very good, but there’s value in comprehending the distinction.

Case in point, Heather mentions being required to register an account in order to make a donation. This is a point in the process dictated by the box office provider, it adds additional steps to the process along with multiple page loads and every step decreases conversion rates. So in this regard, less is definitely more.

“We were wrong about the first-time shoppers. They did mind registering. They resented having to register when they encountered the page.” – Jared M. Spool from The $300 Million Button.

Back on 11/16/2009, I published an article about this very issue and referenced a study from that time by James M. Spool titled The $300 Million Button which discovered that online retailers lost sales by requiring customers to register before making a purchase. Instead, simply adding a single button at the end of the credit card and related info capture process asking the user if s/he wished to create an account for future use increased overall sales.

Although nonprofit performing arts organizations have been comparatively slow to pick up on these mainstream best practices, I can say that as an arts organization focused web provider, who is not a box office provider but does offer basic e-commerce functionality, I am seeing more and more users inquire about implementing a donation process outside of the one supplied by their box office provider.

Even though they know that it usually means they will have some sort of ancillary payment gateway fees and they will have to likely need to manually enter the donor’s info into their CRM database, many still find it worthwhile because they know the current payment process is a conversion killer for small donations.

Admittedly, it feels a bit like being the other woman but in the end, I’m decidedly not after any box office provider’s business. If that’s what I wanted to do, I would have done it already but I want my clients to be happy with their box office providers because it makes my job easier; at the same time, I want my clients to be happy with their overall online presence so if that means setting up a simple two screen process so a patron can make a donation in less than two minutes, that’s what I’ll do. The real kick in the pants here is it is actually pretty easy to set up.

In the meantime, give Heather’s post a read; she promises additional installments so it will be interesting to see what else she observed in her online donation travels. Spoiler alert: she loathes Ticketmons…err…master.

A Bargain

Huh? Why anxiously? You need to chill. :p

I'm not sure what is the best free software I've downloaded. I guess there are a few apps on my phone I would rather not be without (such as Astrid).

I used to use GIMP a lot (on Linux and Windows Vista/7), but found it far too slow. Paint.Net is much better (getpaint.net), I think.


View the original article here

URGENT: Link building Service Required(Indians Only)

Hello,

I want to apply for this job. If you grant me the opportunity to work this job, rest assured I can work with minimal or no supervision, meet deadlines, and understand directions in one go.

I have also expert in on page or off page seo like bookmarking, directory submission, blog submission and powerful open source cms like wordpress and majento or many more..

Skype: rohitsaxena.genius1 & G-talk: rohitsaxena41

Thanking you
Rohit


View the original article here

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Gwist Recap: The Best Video Clips From The Gay YouTube Channel, March 10 - March 17

Gwist is a brand new YouTube channel that brings together videos of interest to the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) community. From the founders of Logo, Gwist isn't ABOUT being gay, but FOR being gay and for anyone who wants to BE a gay!

Each week HuffPost Gay Voices will feature several of the best videos featured on Gwist during the previous seven days. Check out this week's best clips below!

1. "Are You Bisexual?" -- Gwissues
Howard Bragman and special guests Dr. Loren Olson and John Sylla tackle the sometimes-controversial topic of bisexuality. They not only discuss their own experience of bisexuality, but delve into the origins of the term itself.

2. "What's Up Biebs?" -- The Randy Rainbow Show
Randy Rainbow chats with Justin Bieber about rumors and haters, and Randy discovers that he is still suffering from a bad case of Bieber Fever!

3. "Daylight Savings" -- Miss Richfield 1981: Q & You!
Miss Richfield explains how Daylight Savings Time works from a scientific standpoint! Now was it spring back and fall forward or spring up and fall down?

4. "St. Patrick's Day" -- Steam Room Stories
The boys discover that St. Patty's Day is REALLY all about getting so drunk you don't remember any of the ridiculous things you did. Including getting intimate with someone else's Lucky Charms, if you know what I mean.

For more on Gwist, head here.

Also on HuffPost:

Get Alerts

View the original article here

Autoplay Music On The Homepage? No!

You are here: Home > Autoplay Music On The Homepage? No!

Old habits die hard; even the ones that deserve a swift death. Case in point, it never ceases amaze how many performing arts organizations still have an audio file set to autoplay when users visit the website’s homepage. For the most part, the online community crossed the autoplay=bad threshold back in 2011 and although most performing arts groups seem to have caught up to what everyone else realized a few years ago, a few groups seem to have lost the memo.

ITA-GUY-004Back in the day, autoplay was just fine, but this was also the brief period of time from the onset of early broadband internet connections in major metropolitan areas and the onset of the Smartphone revolution.

Back then, browsing was restricted to desktop and laptop environments and surfing the net in working environments wasn’t as common as today. There was even time when having autoplay audio was a tool to demonstrate multimedia prowess.

Times have changed.

Today is a completely different story; mobile devices and high speed cellular connections mean people are in brave new world. High speed mobile devices mean people use the internet in public spaces and those spaces are still defined by personal space and autoplay music is nothing but intrusive.

Even tech style gods like Apple have developed an official position that autoplay auto isn’t kosher and went so far as to disable autoplay in Safari browsers on iOS devices.

If you need additional best practice related advice, then head over to the international community created to develop open standard for web growth, W3C (World Web Consortium). These folks determined that autoplay is sketchy business as well and laid out clear guidelines (section 1.4.2) for non-interference.

For all the folks who insist that orchestras and operas are all about what people hear so their websites must autoplay music so, let’s look at some more practical reasons.

People aren’t as stupid as you think. Really. Simply put, they can find the area on your site that features media clips and play them if desired. And if you’re genuinely interested in bringing in new listeners, they are likely in a generation that knows how to use Facebook, send an email, and has a browser that wasn’t released in 2007. And if cute cat videos are any sign, folks have no trouble finding and sharing multimedia they find entertaining, you don’t have to hammer them with it.When did you become the harbinger of good taste? Who’s to say that the clip you select is going to appeal to such an overwhelming majority that it will create a meaningful emotional bond to begin with? Worst case scenario, you could actually turn away a potential ticket buyer.You’re only going to kill conversion. For those not in the know, conversion is important to your website. It means ticket sales, donations, or social shares. If you only believe a fraction of the mountain of evidence that says autoplaying audio is bad, then do some A/B testing and be sure.

In the end, there are no good reasons to have autoplay music at your organization’s site. Certainly, times may change and the opposite may once again be true but until then, play it smart and play to win the game of online conversion and leave autoplay behind.

$60 Logo Contest

Advertise virtually anything here, with CPM banner ads, CPM email ads and CPC contextual links. You can target relevant areas of the site and show ads based on geographical location of the user if you wish.

Starts at just $1 per CPM or $0.10 per CPC.


View the original article here

Gwyneth Paltrow Miscarriage: Actress Reveals Her Devastation After Losing Third Child

Gwyneth Paltrow Miscarriage Gwyneth Paltrow reveals devastating miscarriage in Mail on Sunday's You magazine on March 17.

Gwyneth Paltrow is opening up about a heartbreaking time in her life.

In a candid interview with the Mail on Sunday’s You magazine today (March 17), the 40-year-old actress reveals that she experienced a miscarriage while pregnant with her third child.

Paltrow, who has two children -- daughter Apple, 8, and son Moses, 6, -- with husband Chris Martin, confesses that she "nearly died" after losing the baby.

"My children ask me to have a baby all the time. And you never know, I could squeeze one more in. I am missing my third. I’m thinking about it," Paltrow explains, continuing, "But I had a really bad experience when I was pregnant with my third. It didn’t work out and I nearly died. So I am like, 'Are we good here or should we go back and try again?'"

One thing is for certain -- new parents and Paltrow's pals Jay-Z and Beyonce have made her reconsider getting pregnant again. "Their baby Blue Ivy is totally delish," she gushes. "She’s made me very broody."

The "Iron Man 3" star has been honest about adding to her brood, recently confessing that she thought about having another child when her son Moses was younger.

"My brain says, 'Oh, I think I'm done, the kids are so big now, and I don't want to go back to changing diapers,'" she told the October issue of InStyle magazine. "But a part of me would love to have another. Of course, I'm old now!"

Still, no matter what Paltrow decides in the baby department, she knows she chose the best man to raise a family with.

"Regardless of what happens in our marriage, I chose the best father," she tells You magazine of Coldplay frontman Martin, 36. "He is so good to the children, and to know that you had kids with such a good man is like a real weight off you. We are committed co-parents, we make all the decisions together and we lean on each other for support as well."

Also on HuffPost:

Get Alerts

View the original article here

Free .co.vu domain name

I was surfing around and just saw this, you may get 2 .co.vu for free. You can sign up at http://setup.co.vu
I think that this is still pretty new (looking at their facebook fans count), so they are still a lot of good domain name available.

This is from the faq:
What is co.vu?
It's a domain name provider. i.e. You can have your own custom owned domain names for free. Example: myname.co.vu , mycompany.co.vu

What is the use of having your own domain name?
- You can publish your contents in his own name. yourname.co.vu.
- A small scale Industry can start its own custom domain name based website. eg.. mycompany.co.vu
- Everyone can select their own custom domain names for their websites.(Whether it's Personal, Social Networking, Business, e-commerce, and everything). You can keep your favorite name as the domain name of your website, that too for free.

Hope this helps.
This is an ad that I inserted!


View the original article here